Monopolized industries are too powerful
High costs of seeking protection
Insuffient enforcement of the "Law on the Protection of Consumers‘ Rights and Interests"
It is too much trouble and not worth the time
Limited functions of the consumers‘ association
Consumers lack the awareness of their lawful rights
Mild punishments for unlawful business behaviors
Other
Complain to the manufacturer, service provider or seller and demand compensation
Keep quiet and never go back there again
Complain to yourself and wish bad things happen to the bad guy
Go to the consumers‘ association and file a complaint
Dial “12315” and file a complaint
Publish an announcement on TV or in the newspaper
Start a legal action at the people‘s court
Expose the product or service and the manufacturer, service provider or seller on the internet as a warning to other people
Electronics (PC, cell phones, MP3 player, etc.)
Books
Furniture
Food
Office supply
Clothes and shoes
Accessories (hats, bags, purses, etc.)
Household electric appliances
Computer software and other similar products
Credits (for phone calls, etc.)
Other stuffs
I never buy things on the internet
It is an effective anti-monopoly measure and the right decision.
This decision will help the healthy development of China´s juice industry.
China should build more international brands of its own.
The government should not interfere with the market operation.
This may arouse suspicion of protectionism.
As long as the product is of good quality and reasonable price, I don´t care it is a Chinese brand or a foreign one.
This is not a good example for other countries in the current world economic situation.
Hard to say
